It may find itself as the only tank available in a battle due to the constraints of terrain, and it may often find itself supporting infantry actions as well as other vehicles. This may also mean that the Chimera will have to behave in support of friendlies in a different environment. Recognizing that the Chimera is also better off as a general support vehicle for MBTs and infantry is the next good step.Īnd finally, we have to recognize that the Chimera's all terrain mobility can bring it to places that other MBTs will likely be absent in. The use of terrain by reversing on slopes and objects is one good step. The Chimera needs a different approach to be effective. You refuse to accept nor change your mind about what appears to be the truth regarding the Chimera. What was hardly done, is to create a different and effective approach for the Chimera.
It simply shows that the Chimera failed as an MBT(which I don't deny) because it was being tested and used like the faction MBTs.
None of what you say discovered the tactic of reversing on objects and slopes to cover the large hull while keeping the turret above the object and the slope. First off, there is much more evidence that this fleshing out of the Chimera (which you have no evidence for by the way) was performed under the idea that the Chimera should perform like other MBTs.Īlso, I have evidence for what I am doing, in spite of the fact that you deny their worth.
0 kommentar(er)
